Standardized Testing is Stupid - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1865 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/06/24 Category Management Essay Level High school Tags: Standardized Testing Essay Did you like this example? Standardized tests are superfluous in light of the fact that they are horrendous to the psyches of numerous blameless understudies. Every year, the tests get harder and stricter until the point that the understudies cant process their own considerations. The tests wind up agonizing to the brains of those just beginning in the realm of tests. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Standardized Testing is Stupid?" essay for you Create order The understudies as of now doing combating in the war are proceeding to fall further and more profound into the universe of uncreativity and limitation. As the dividers tight in on them, they are lost and unfit to wind up creative masterminds. Besides, the usage of government sanctioned tests into the state funded educational systems of the United States of America has disputably raised two unique perspectivesthe defenders versus the adversaries in the clash of the viability of state sanctioned tests. Government sanctioned tests require all test takers to answer similar inquiries; the tests are additionally scored in a standard way. Hence, the training framework trusts that it is reasonable for everyone to step through a similar exam since it is planning understudies for school learning. As a general rule, knowledge cant exclusively be dictated by a test score; accordingly, state sanctioned tests are ineffectual in empowering learning in instructive situations for three reasons: they are unpleasant, unfair, and uncreative. Since the beginning of government sanctioned testing in the United States, students have seen the test as a compelling apparatus to construct a general public on greatness and achievement. Moreover, state sanctioned tests have created and spread in different government funded schools as an unproblematic method to test a lot of understudies rapidly. Instructors utilize test scores to assess understudy execution, educator capability, and school adequacy. Be that as it may, government sanctioned tests are not the most ideal approach to test people on their insight. As indicated by Standardized tests are unnecessary because they are excruciating to the minds of many innocent students. Each year, the tests get tougher and stricter until the students cannot process their own thoughts. The tests become torturous to the minds of those only starting in the world of tests. The students already battling in the war are continuing to fall deeper and deeper into the world of uncreativity and narr owness. As the walls narrow in on them, they are lost and unable to become innovative thinkers. Moreover, the implementation of standardized tests into the public school systems of the United States of America has controversially raised two different views â€Å"the proponents versus the opponents in the battle of the effectiveness of standardized tests. Standardized tests require all test takers to answer the same questions; the tests are also scored in a standard manner. Thus, the education system believes that it is fair for everybody to take the same test because it is preparing students for college learning. In reality, intelligence cannot solely be determined by a test score; therefore, standardized tests are ineffective in encouraging learning in educational environments for three reasons: they are stressful, discriminatory, and uncreative. Throughout the history of standardized testing in the United States of America, citizens have viewed the test as an effective tool to build a society on excellence and success. Furthermore, standardized tests have developed and spread in various public schools as an unproblematic way to test a large amount of students quickly. Educators use test scores to evaluate student performance, teacher proficiency, and school effectiveness. However, standardized tests are not the best way to test individuals on their knowledge. In the word of Dan Fletcher, Standardized tests have been a scourge of student life in America for more than 50 years because they are more pressure packed and ubiquitous than ever before. Standardized tests are eradicating the opportunity for students to succeed because their enthusiasm for learning is replaced with anxiety and obsession over tests and grades. There are different forms of intelligence that go beyond what our school system measures. Students are not a u nit to be measured, and students cannot be assigned a numerical value to identify their intelligence. Students are diverse†they learn at different speeds, and they learn in different ways. Focusing solely on test scores is hurting our students and deviating away from building our society on success and excellence. Critics are slowly realizing the problems associated with standardized testing† they create anxiety, are extremely biased and do not measure the ability to think deeply. It is not possible for these test to take in account the diversities of racial background, school systems, school experiences, and location. Standardized tests dont value diversity. There are a wide range of differences in the people who take standardized tests: they have different cultural backgrounds, different levels of proficiency in the English language, different learning and thinking styles, different family backgrounds, different past experiences. And yet the standardized test treats them as if they were all identical. Standardized testing also falls under No Child Left Behind which formed under Former President George W. Bush which isnt effective as well. There are a number of reasons why this is so. For one thing, test results vary considerably from year to year, so that teachers ranked high for effectiveness (because their kids scored well on tests) in one year find that, for a variety of factors beyond their control, their students perform worse the following year. One study, for example, conducted across five large urban school districts found that fewer than a third of teachers ranked in the top 20 percent of effectiveness in one year were in that rank the following yearand a third of that group found themselves in the bottom 40 percent. So how could a teacher that was consider great the previous year be determined bad the next. Rigid curriculums that focus on right and wrong answers teach children to see the world in binaries. These methods dont encourage creativity or innovation. I fear that our deeply flawed education system will produce generations of people who lack critical thinking skills. How can students be expected to become highly skilled or passionate about anything when theyre asked to simply regurgitate information? What kind of choices will they make in their adult lives when they have never been taught how to look at the nuances and complexities of situations? Who will have the tools to question authority? Who will question the status quo? How will we compete with other countries when our younger generations have not been encouraged to develop their inquisitiveness and engage with the world? I fear that our system is failing children by encouraging them to be mindless consumers. High tests scores do not make someone well-educated or well-rounded and memorizing facts does not equal intelligence. Public education should not be a commodity, but a foundation for children to at least have the possibility of succeeding in the world now than any time in recent memory. State sanctioned tests are annihilating the open door for students to succeed in light of the fact that their excitement for learning is supplanted with tension and fixation on tests and grades. There are distinctive types of insight that go past what our educational system measures. Students are not a unit to be estimated, and students cant be appointed a test which doesnt measure up to tell what theyve learned. Students are assorted†they learn at various rates, and they learn in various ways. Concentrating exclusively on test scores is harming our students and straying far from building our general publi c on progress and brilliance. Pundits are gradually understanding the issues related with state sanctioned testing†they make uneasiness, are to a great degree one-sided and dont gauge the capacity to think profoundly. It isnt workable for these test to consider the assorted varieties of racial background , educational systems, school encounters, and area. Standardized tests dont understand diversity. There are an extensive variety of contrasts in the general population who take standardized tests: they have distinctive social foundations, diverse dimensions of capability in the English dialect, different learning and styles, diverse family foundations, distinctive past experiences. But then the state sanctioned test regards them as though they were all indistinguishable. Since students realize that test scores may influence their future lives, they do whatever they can to pass them, including duping and taking execution drugs. Since educators realize that test scores may influence their jobs and financial stability , they likewise cheat (see the blockbuster Freakonomics for some intriguing measurements on this). My Opponents May express that state administered testing has turned out to be extremely useful. They may even reach as far as to state that standardized testing is a precise and powerful method for truly estimating a students benchmark for the year on the material they might possibly have the learning over. Standardized testing can give benchmarks to guardians and educators. This enables guardians and teachers to perceive how an student is getting along contrasted with different students in his or her class, city, and country. Additionally standardized tests can help recognize issue territories in individual students, and schools and educational programs. In any case, the issue with those announcements are that in light of the fact that a student realizes an equation doesnt really mean they know the material. Likewise in view of the students background, ethnicity and different factors outside the classroom material which is known to influence the learning examples of understudies, it could prompt a terrible score which considers awfully an extraordinary educator and an student who is an incredible student and has an great mentality and creative mind yet conditions arent that great. Additionally state sanctioned testing removes a students creativeness in answers when one is given to them yet may not be fundamentally all they have learned. Inflexible educational modules that focus on good and bad answers instruct students to see the world in pairs. These strategies dont encourage imagination or advancement. I expect that our profoundly imperfect instruction framework will deliver years of individuals who need basic reasoning abilities. By what method would students be able to be required to wind up exceptionally talented or energetic about anything when theyre asked to just spew data? What sort of decisions will they make in their grown-up lives when they have never been instructed what to look like at the subtleties and complexities of circumstances? Who will have the apparatuses to address specialist? Who will scrutinize business as usual? In what manner will we contend with different nations when our more youthful ages have not been urged to build up their curiosity and connect with the world? I expect that our framework is coming up short kids by urging them to be thoughtless High tests scores dont make anyone knowledgeable or balanced and retaining actualities does not equivalent insight. State funded ought not be a problem, but rather an establishment for kids to at any rate have the likelihood of success in the world. https://jackfisherbooks.com/2017/06/01/why-standardized-tests-make-you-feel-dumber-in-the-long-run/ Footnotes Sources Standardized Tests ProCon.orgProCon.org ? standardizedtests ? view.res 34 problems with standardized tests The Washington PostWashington Post ? news ? 2017/04/19 Teachers and the testing mania | SocialistWorker.orgSocialistWorker.org ? 2012/09/18 ? teac The high stakes of standardized testsSchools of Thought CNN schoolsofthought.blogs.cnn.com ? https://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1947019,00.html